It's not in the standard. I'm completely against adding anything to the response object that is non-standard if it means writing different code paths for different containers.
I am, however, somewhat in favor of sending response headers on the response objects if it's part of the spec. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some folks using the OAuth proxy in Shindig are agitating for > additional information to be returned from makeRequest. For example, > they want the set-cookie header from the target server. Thoughts on > this? >
