Why doesn't the compliance gadget just use relative paths and set a <base>
element? It's ugly but it actually does work.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Louis Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the compliance gadget is going to do something like this then it should
> opt out of the rewriter. Ill take a look at the error Cassie mentioned.
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had to turn off the concat servlet because the on-demand code in the
> > compliance gadget doesn't do so well when it's DOM is messed with..
> >
> > var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName('script');
> > for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; i++) {
> > if (scripts[i].src && scripts[i].src.indexOf('testlibs.js') > 0) {
> > var path = scripts[i].src.replace(/testlibs\.js(\?.*)?$/, '');
> > for (var j = 0; j < this.coreLibraries.length; j++) {
> > var include = this.coreLibraries[j];
> > this.require(path + include + '.js');
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > this.loaded = true;
> >
> > This results in some mangled URL that results in a 404. However these
> 404s
> > cause the loop to spin.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Cassie wrote:
> >
> > The current version of Shindig has a bug somewhere in the gadgets/concat
> >> code. If you try to load a more complex gadget into the samplecontainer
> >> like
> >> some of the compliance tests:
> >>
> >>
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/tests/trunk/suites/0.7/appdata/appdata.xml
> >>
> >>
> >> The server will spit out a bunch of lines like this:
> >> 2008-09-05 18:26:31.534::WARN: /gadgets/concat: java.io.IOException:
> >> Closed
> >> 2008-09-05 18:26:31.653::WARN: /gadgets/concat: java.io.IOException:
> >> Closed
> >>
> >>
> >> Can someone who has familiarity with the concat code please take a look?
> >> (I'll try to find a specific revision in the meantime)
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> - Cassie
> >>
> >
> > Paul Lindner
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
