On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:18 PM, John Hjelmstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This might be a problem -- the rewriter registry has no knowledge of its > calling context, and I'm loath to add specific caching APIs/parameters to > its methods unless absolutely necessary. Can you say more about why this is > required? In what way can't the rewriting behavior in this case key on > <rewriters>+<input string hash>?
Hmm. Maybe it isn't necessary. Can you explain the caching algorithm for the rewriters? I thought it must be based on URL, but if it isn't, maybe there's no problem.
