Hi Chris, Guido and All, First of all let me acknowledge the mistake and ask for apologies. One of the engineers surely has taken a short cut. While that is something internal to what I need to look into, I assure you that it was not to my knowledge. It would have been foolish of me to do so publicly.
I am not against derivative work, just that the goal was for a fresh initiative. Having said that let me assure you that we will update the license related text tomorrow our working day and make sure we stay compliant to what is necessary. Thank you for bringing this out, I would rather know it now than later. I am looking forward for more fruitful interactions and taking esprit on its way. best regards, Astha On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Guido Barosio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Let me take this opportunity to clarify that esprit is not a derivative > work > > of partuza. Esprit has been written from scratch by our R&D team. :) We > have > > used only one javascript file which we are working on to license as per > the > > derivative work requirements. We ourselves are APL 2.0 > > Well, maybe your R&D team (or one of the guys) took some code without > mentioning? Ashta, what Chris said is definitely true and correct. > Furthermore, the fact that many of your php pieces do not include a > License triggers my attention. > > Anyway, this is good news and for sure we are all happy! > > BTW, is there something that Esprit already complies and Partuza does not? > > gb.- > > PS Chris: The "uglaaaaaayyyy" worked betta' than an md5 of your own source! > ;-) > > > -- > Guido Barosio > ----------------------- > http://www.globant.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
