Answer via cellular.

Is'ot the soft designed to work only with google app engine? Not
tracking so closely...

2008/9/12, Evan Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:25 PM, John Hjelmstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Evan Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Wanted to revive the thread on using code review tools with Shindig.
>> There
>> > is a really good tool up at http://codereview.appspot.com, and I'd like
>> to
>> > discuss whether it is OK to use for reviews.
>> > - Sample diff: http://codereview.appspot.com/5245/diff/1/2
>> > - Full review: http://codereview.appspot.com/5245
>> >
>> > Here's my quick list of pluses and minuses...
>> >
>> > Good:
>> > - Ability to email cc on reviews, so that the official record is still
>> > on
>> > shindig-dev@
>> > - Threaded comment support, very clean inline display of diffs
>> > - Open source, so we can run our own instance if we need to customize
>> > - But hosted for now, so we can easily try it out
>> > - Doesn't require a login to view patches and comments
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Bad:
>> > - Hosted on appspot, which requires a Google login to comment. We can
>> > change
>> > this if we run our own hosted version.
>>
>>
>> How difficult would it be to maintain reasonably current code, were we to
>> switch out a different set of IDs? Do you have any sense for how
>> extensible
>> the tool is, particularly for integration with JIRA, shindig-commit@, et
>> al?
>
>
> As long as we have python developers, should be easy. I imagine that it
> would be a good enhancement to the core code to support all of these
> features via config.
>
> If not, the code base seems to be about 150K, so I don't think we'll have a
> problem keeping it up to date.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse/#svn/trunk/codereview
>
>
>>
>>
>> In general I'm all for it, particularly since it already works (per your
>> example).. at least for patches to start. It's far better than reading
>> manually through diffs in email.
>>
>> --John
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > How do people feel about trying this out on an experimental basis?
>> >
>> > Evan
>> >
>> > P.S. Does anyone know what the URL format is to access for revisions of
>> > files in svn? It looks like the diffs only work against the most recent
>> > version in SVN, as it is using
>> >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/trunk/java/server/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/server/endtoend/EndToEndServer.java
>> > ?*rev=690667*<
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/trunk/java/server/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/server/endtoend/EndToEndServer.java?*rev=690667*>as
>> the URL format, which doesn't actually get the bolded
>> > revision.
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to