I noticed this same stuff and this needs to be fixed asap before too many people start writing oauth gadgets!
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-609 particularly: xoauth_signature_publickey / xoauth_public_key and opensocial_app_id / xoauth_app_url / opensocial_app_url for ref: http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-container/browse_thread/thread/bb5204db2476fbd7 davep On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Eiji Kitamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm trying to get clearer on OAuth on OpenSocial / Shindig and have a > few questions. > Sorry if these questions are not appropriate for this list. > > [1] opensocial_*id > > According to following document: > https://sites.google.com/site/oauthgoog/2leggedoauth/2opensocialrestapi > > OpenSocial container sends OAuth Consumer Request query with > * opensocial_ownerid > * opensocial_viewerid > * opensocial_appid > > But when I look at google code gadgets site document: > http://code.google.com/apis/gadgets/docs/reference/#gadgets.io > > It's said to send following query params which names are slightly different: > * opensocial_owner_id > * opensocial_viewer_id > * opensocial_app_id > > Actual Shindig implementation looks like sending queries same as > google code gadgets site explanation: > * opensocial_owner_id > * opensocial_viewer_id > * opensocial_app_id > > Is the one on oauthgoog just typo or do they have different meaning? > > > [2] xoauth_public_key > > According to following proposal: > http://dirk.balfanz.googlepages.com/oauth_key_rotation.html > > Public Key Identifier should be specified using "xoauth_public_key". > Same on google code gadgets site. > But actual implementation in Shindig seems like using > "xoauth_signature_publickey". > > Which is correct or should they be treated differently? > > [3] xoauth_app_url > > According to following proposal: > http://dirk.balfanz.googlepages.com/oauth_gadget_extension.html > > App url should be specified using "xoauth_app_url". But it looks like > there's "opensocial_app_url" mentioned on google code gadgets site. > Shindig is implemented with "opensocial_app_url" too. > > Which is correct or should they be treated differently? > > > Thanks in advance. >
