I think that we should fix the broken MessageBundles behavior before declaring 1.0.
Please see the "Re: svn commit: r719145" email thread for details. Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Ropu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Proposal To Branch for 1.0 Today +1 nice to have a SNAPSHOT :D ropu On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds good to me. > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't expect this to be controversial, but I should as just for > process. > > > > Proposing > > Branch shindig to > > branches/1.0.x with a version of 1-SNAPSHOT > > increment trunk version to 1.1-SNAPSHOT indicating 1.1 will be the next > > release. > > > > The version numbers are more for Java than for Php, but I guess there > might > > be a version number in the php code ? > > > > I have done a dry run of the maven release plugin and there are no > issues, > > so it should be a simple one command process. (it also branches the php > code > > because we left a pom in the base directory) > > > > Any comments ? > > Happy with the version numbers ? > > > > Ian > > > > > -- .-. --- .--. ..- R o p u
