On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>The proper name - for the bean and for the JSON - is "formatted". SVN >>revision 723617 needs to be rolled back. SHINDIG-764 should have been >>closed as not-a-bug. > > Only if you update the documentation on the model classes, which > clearly state that the model tracks the Javascript API. Otherwise, it > is a bug.
Agreed, the docs need to be updated. Of course, working code + broken docs is better than broken code + broken docs, which is what we have now. > It is called documentation so that people understand what the code > does. The fact that the patch was eagerly applied shows that there > *is* confusion about the semantics. Couldn't agree more, this is highly confusing. -- Adam
