Ah yeah that's a known issue unfortunately, since we switched to the RPC protocol we haven't really bothered to update the REST implementation's javascript implementation.
Thats to say, it's probably simple to fix, but no one with the correct background has found it urgent enough to actually go and do it :) I think we should really just remove the 'impl' config key, and always assume RPC since it's presence does lead to a lot of confusion. -- Chris On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Sean Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > That looks right. It builds ok if impl is "rpc" but once it is changed to > "rest" it will fail. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Chabot [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 3 February, 2009 10:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RESTful support in java shindig > > Maybe the container.js config file hasn't been updated since the local > changes conflict with svn, and thus your using an invalid config? > > That bit of config should read something like: > "opensocial-0.8" : { > // Path to fetch opensocial data from > // Must be on the same domain as the gadget rendering server > "impl" : "rpc", //Use "rpc" to enable JSON-RPC, "rest' for REST > "path" : "http://%host%/social";, > "domain" : "shindig", > "enableCaja" : false, > "supportedFields" : { > "person" : ["id", {"name" : ["familyName", "givenName", > "unstructured"]}, "thumbnailUrl", "profileUrl"], > "activity" : ["id", "title"] > } > } > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sean Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hmmm. I am getting test failures (can't fetch person info) when trying to > > build java shindig when setting impl = rest in container.js. It seems > that > > there is still a reference to jsonBatch in restfulcontainer.js. Or is > this > > some misconfiguration on my part? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Chabot [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, 3 February, 2009 7:25 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: RESTful support in java shindig > > > > jsonBatch was an old, undocumented, non-spec standard that we used before > > we > > actually had a good spec in place; So once we defined the JSON-RPC spec > in > > 0.8.1, we switched over to that. > > > > I'm not sure what the 'current story' is that your asking about, other > then > > 'Yes it supports both the REST and RPC end points'. > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Sean Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What was the reason the handling of jsonBatch was removed from java > > > shindig? What is the current story with REST support? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > >
