Hi Chico, mmmh an automated deployment for the site seems to be a good idea at the first read but... few developers looks at Hudson *regularly* so I guess it should be the same for the automated site.
The site actually contains the project info reports and if running with reporting profile, it will contain Javadocs and some QA reports. So site is useful only for QA reports. Instead of automated deployment, we could create a QA profile with failOnError = true for wanted QA plugins. If we have a notifications @ for Hudson, we could receive QA errors then devs could have a glance on pb. Also, IMHO we will lost the user with this new doc space in addition to the official website (not really up to date) and 2 wikis. Cheers, Vincent 2009/2/20, chico charlesworth <[email protected]>: > I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an automated > fashion .. > > I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few things w/ > each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting vulnerability > was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module: > - "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header, which > allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more information." > > I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that findbugs > highlighted this .. > > I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part of the > automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these > 'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and the TODO > tag list also warrants having this :) > > Cheers > Chico > > 2009/2/19 Ian Boston <[email protected]> > > > I have been deploying it at > http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig> > > > > > but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on people > > (probably because I should not be using it :)) > > > > It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain how it > > would deploy from there. > > Ian > > > > > > > > On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote: > > > > Hi all, > >> > >> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where the > >> site > >> is being deployed to? > >> > >> Cheers > >> Chico > >> > > > > >
