"Sean Lin" <[email protected]> writes: > Well each gadget does not have to use it, hence the <Require> option. But > then again it's up to the developer just to put in a script tag if they > really want to use jquery to create their gadget. Just thought it might > render faster if the container was serving it directly. > > When you said it just works on your container, I'm guessing you have > everything running on a single domain. >
Not always. We sometimes separate the shindig server and the main application server. But yes, we basically control every gadget's content. Did anybody on this list tried to factorize such things as jQuery ? When I was talking about concerns, I hinted at our own performance issues: having 5 gadgets on a page each loading jquery plus a handful of plugins put IE6 on his knees. More generally, I'd rather have injection of such services in the container. I know however that container/gadget communication may be hard for different origins. -- Arnaud Bailly, PhD Leroy-Merlin - SIF - Projet Portail Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont établis à l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'intégrité de ce message, le contenu de ce message ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la part de Leroy Merlin.
