On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that comments on have been made to provide A2 licenses where > applicable, and it looks like the rest of the code is A2 licensed. Provided > you as a CLA signitory have recorded permission from the copyright holder > (google I assume) to re-assign the license, and we (Shindig) as a community > are prepared to take on maintenance of the code, then there should be no > problem in pulling this in. There contribution will need to me appropriately > attributed in the NOTICE file. > > But I am a relative newcomer to Apache, and not a lawyer. > Ian > > > BTW, how is the speed of this DOM based lib ?
The DOM lib uses clone operations instead of fine grained DOM access, which helps a lot, but think it is still slower. We may switch to string concatenation at some point in the future. > > I did a project recently where we had to use string parsing and compilation > into native JS, as all the DOM based JS template languages crippled the > browser. > > > > On 2 Apr 2009, at 15:32, Lev Epshteyn wrote: > > Guys, I need advice on how to best go about getting a branch of JSTemplate >> into the Shindig codebase. >> >> JSTemplate is a DOM-based template library currently used by the >> client-side >> OpenSocial template implementation. libhttp:// >> code.google.com/p/google-jstemplate/ >> >> As a result of some spec changes, I have had to modify this library to >> continue working for us - and these changes aren't likely to be integrated >> back into the trunk of JST because they are pretty specific to some >> decisions made by OpenSocial. Therefore, I would like to create a copy >> within the Shindig codebase and modify it as needed. >> >> I had initially (and naively) simply copied the files in as part of a >> patch >> (http://codereview.appspot.com/32041/show) but Evan has suggested that a >> more formal process may be in order. Please let me know what the best way >> to >> go about this is. >> > >
