That's great to know! Thanks for the pointer.

It would be nice to note it on the website too.

On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:

Hi Tim,

ASF has a lot of projects, including Shindig, using GIT (read-only)
http://git.apache.org/

Cheers,

Vincent

2009/6/11 Tim Moore <tmo...@atlassian.com>:
I would be highly enthusiastic about Shindig moving to git. I expect that many companies that use Shindig maintain an internal fork of the code. I
know we do. Git can make managing that kind of thing much nicer.

-- Tim

On Jun 11, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Paul Lindner wrote:

When I moved over to my new job I started using git for everything,
including shindig. So far so good. A bit of a learning curve, but very
satisfying once you get all the pieces working together.
The git-cheatsheet
http://ktown.kde.org/~zrusin/git/git-cheat-sheet.svg has
most of what you need to know.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Brown <e...@google.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Santiago Gala <santiago.g...@gmail.com

wrote:

El jue, 11-06-2009 a las 17:11 +0200, Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió:

Hello,

On 29th of June I'll start working on Gerrit[1] project for next three

months. I think this would be a perfect

opportunity to introduce Gerrit as part of the experimental Git

infrastructure.

In order to make this effort practical I seek for a bunch of interested

committers willing to experiment with Gerrit as

a patch review tool. This implies that community of given project must

be

enthusiastic on Git as whole as such

experiment will change project practices slightly and introduce Git

into

development cycle as a tool for collaboration

between comitters and contributors.

If you know any project fulfilling these requirements and willing to

play

with Git a little bit more let me know here so

we can discuss some more details.

[1] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/


(incubator-)Shindig can be a reasonable candidate, out of several
reasons:
- there is extensive use of code review for patches already, so it would
be mostly a matter of switching URLs
- I'm not so sure about effective git usage. Some people seems to be
using it, but this would need to be checked.


I'm not terribly familiar with git beyond a presentation from Linus that
I
saw a few years ago, but I'd be willing to give it a try if it means
better
integration for reviews than the current codereview.appspot.com - > patch
ugliness.




I'm CCing shindig-dev, to see how people reacts to it.

Regards
Santiago






Reply via email to