Okay, sounds good then. For the truly bleeding edge should we have hudson publish timestamped snapshots somewhere?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Vincent Siveton <vincent.sive...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Paul, > > No don't use p.a.o > > You should use [1] with mvn deploy. All artifacts will be in snapshots > repo. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/ > > 2009/6/19 Paul Lindner <lind...@inuus.com>: > > Currently there is no maven repo for 1.1. > > > > As part of getting the 1.1 snapshots available I plan to publish to a > maven > > repo on people.apache.org. Should get to this early next week. > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Martin Svensson < > > martin.a.svens...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am quite new to shindig development. Me and my interns are working on > >> a Open Social bridge to IMS type informartion. So far everything has > >> worked without any problems, the only thing I havent find is a maven > >> (shapshot) repository for the Shindig 1.1. components. I was thinking of > >> setting up such repository internally at our site but wanted to check if > >> you already deploy those components to an externally accessible > >> repository. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Martin Svensson > >> Ericsson Research > >> > >> Ps > >> If anyone is interested in what we are going with this work let me know > >> > > >
