As far as I understood, the preferences rendering has to be done by writing code at your end. Even the implementation in the sample codes is making use of google infrastructure to generate the UI for preferences managment. I am not sure if it would be ok for your use.
I bleieve Shindig only provides the infrastructure for iframe generation , that is, to render the gadget alone, with a given set of preferences, not a facility to render the preferences management. Thanks and Regards, Hafiz 2009/6/25 Steven Shearer <steve...@gmail.com> > If a gadget is loaded via JavaScript as with the samples and sample > container, the client side container scripts render a title bar with > options > to edit the user preferences for said gadget. > > If, however, a gadget is loaded via the ifr url technique, there's no > immediate access to user preferences. Is this by design? > > Just to be clear I'm referring to using the following approach: > > http://localhost:8080/gadgets/ifr?url=spec.xml > > I'm attempting to embed Google and OpenSocial gadgets in an existing site > but without the user preferences being accessible when using the ifr url > technique this approach is pretty a non-starter for me -- and for various > reasons I'd actually prefer to use this approach over embedding via > JavaScript. > > Thanks for the assistance. > > Steve > -- He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever.
