Tim,

Thanks for the explanation and the link.  I'll read through it and
chew on it, and see where I go from there.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Tim Moore <tmo...@atlassian.com> wrote:
> Well, there is another thing that is unusual about our environment. Most
> OSGi environments run with the OSGi container as the primary framework, with
> servlets running inside via the OSGi HttpService. In our case, OSGi is used
> as an embedded plugin framework for large, existing, non-OSGi-based webapps.
> You can see more about our architecture in these slides if you're
> interested: http://www.slideshare.net/mrdon/the-web-on-osgi-heres-how
>
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, David Boyer wrote:
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> Currently we've done something similar, except that we took the
>> shindig war-file, and built the equivalent of a webapp, that we
>> surface to an embedded jetty.  We don't do the servlet mapping, we
>> just take it and expose it through the embedded jetty.
>>
>> Personally I'm new to using OSGi (3 months), and most of my work to
>> date hasn't needed a deep thorough understanding of it, but with my
>> limited knowledge  I believe you avoided what we think we want to do:
>>
>> a.  Modify maven so that it can produce OSGi bundles for each of the 4
>> shindig jars (social-api, server, gadget, and common).
>> b.  These bundles would include package import directives which would
>> result in the shindig dependencies getting picked up from OSGi.
>> c.  Use internal OSGi extensions to surface the OpenSocial servlets to
>> our web application.
>>
>> Why did you avoid using 4 bundles instead of one?
>
> In our case, we're integrating Shindig with several different applications
> that share the common OSGi-based plugin framework but are otherwise very
> different. We wanted to encapsulate Shindig and provide a very simplified
> API/SPI that only exposed a small number of interface points. The teams
> responsible for the integration could then focus on using those, without
> having to be intimately familiar with Shindig itself. Other functionality
> that was common across our applications is managed by the layer of code that
> lives in our bundle (what we call the atlassian-gadgets-opensocial-plugin).
>
> -- Tim
>
>



-- 
David S Boyer
mang...@gmail.com
703.499.8728(h)
703.408.5395(m)

Reply via email to