Improper JavaScript inclusion logic leads to out-of-order and duplicate
includes / JavaScript errors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SHINDIG-1260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1260
Project: Shindig
Issue Type: Bug
Components: PHP
Affects Versions: 1.1-BETA5, 1.1-BETA6, 1.1-RC1
Environment: RedHat Linux 5.3, Apache 2.2.3, PHP 5.2.10
Reporter: James McIninch
The logic for selecting and inserting JavaScript using the
GadgetFeatureRegistry and GadgetBaseRender is incorrect. The result is that
JavaScript for features is included out-of-order of their dependencies,
sometimes multiply included, and the 'gadgets' JavaScript object is not defined.
Consider the following simple gadget:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Module>
<ModulePrefs title="Hello" description="An example of a simple gadget"
author="James McIninch" author_email="[email protected]" />
<UserPref name="firstname" display_name="Your name" datatype="string"
default_value="stranger" />
<Content type="html" preferred_height="50" preferred_width="200">
<![CDATA[
<script type="text/javascript">
var prefs = new gadgets.Prefs();
var name = prefs.getString("firstname");
document.getElementById("placeholder").innerHTML = name;
</script>
Hello, <span id="placeholder">name goes here</span>!
]]>
</Content>
</Module>
This is rendered as:
Hello, name goes here!
Inspecting the JavaScript error console shows that 'gadgets' is undefined.
However, the first instance of 'gadgets' being undefined lies in the
Shindig-included JavaScript. This is because auth-init.js is included before
config.js (both in features/src/main/javascript/features/core.*), but
auth-init.js contains the line (28):
shindig.auth = new shindig.Auth();
which, in turn calls (auth.js line 159):
gadgets.config.register("shindig.auth", null, init);
... but the 'gadgets' and 'gadgets.config' objects are not yet defined at that
point. Despite being dependencies for the auth.js, they aren't included in the
order where the dependencies precede the code that depends on them.
Also looking at the source of the rendered gadget, the taming.js code is
included 5 separate times.
Correcting the bug will entail re-thinking the logic of the feature ordering to
include the dependency information and order the features based on the
dependencies.
All gadgets requiring the 'gadgets' object to be defined currently fail.
Gadgets using the legacy model still function, though there exists redundant
and erroneous JavaScript.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.