Am 05.05.2011 12:43, schrieb nap:


On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Hienz, Michael <mhi...@lear.com <mailto:mhi...@lear.com>> wrote:

    Hi Jean,

Hi,

    I am not sure which merlin db version you used when coding the
    broker for it, but my suggestion would be to use the merlin 0.9.0
    one. This is the latest stable one and the one they are currently
    developing on. In regards to the reports the Ninja itself install
    will take care about the additional tables needed and the broker
    itself, does not need to feed those, because it’s pulling the
    information from the exsting merlin tables.

    One question I have though, with the 0.5.6 version of Shinken.
    There now is a module to run the “old” Nagios command pipe, which
    is great, because when using Ninja adding comments or downtimes
    for example, these are submitted to the nagios.cmd. (That is stuff
    not working in your VMWare Virtual box builds). Nevertheless when
    I add a comment to a host through Ninja, it successfully makes the
    entry and I can see that comment in the Thruk frontend for
    example, but it does not appear on the Ninja frontend, because the
    corresponding db table is not filled with that data. I assume
    (haven’t checked this yet) that the merlin daemon usually needs to
    fill that piece of data, so it’s not done by Ninja itself.

Yes, it is just tables we do not fill right now I think. I didn't work on this module since months, because no one seems to mix Shinken and Ninja, but if you want it, it will raise in my priority tasks :)

    That would mean that the merlin broker, needs to be adjusted in a
    way that all kind of commands coming through Ninja frontend
    (acknowledgements, comments, scheduled downtimes, etc.) are
    inserted into the merlin db. I am not sure how big your focus is
    on this frontend support, because I have seen you mentioning that
    Ninja is not multi daemon compatible and if you use multiple
    daemons in shinken, you just see half of the checks made. On the
    other hand it’s a good frontend, especially in the reports area,
    and this kind of functionality is always a good “seller”, when
    talking to the decision makers. J

The multi daemon problem was with a old version, I think now this should be solved in a current Ninja version, I'll try to look if it's good or not :)

The problem with Ninja is that it will never manage some main shinken features like root problem/uimpact + criticity for example, and it's quite a big miss for users I think. But if you want to run with it, especially with the good reporting module, it can be good to upgrade the module for new versions :)


Jean

    Michael


Hi Jean,
the last few days/weeks I tried to implement the criticity feature to the Ninja UI. I used a sandbox DB with one extra column each table(Host:criticity & Service:criticity). This way the sql query is quite simple. I'm not so good in MySQL and PHP but this is my result of playing uround with Shinken and Ninja. http://www.unitedseed.de/tmp/ShinkenCriticity.png

If you think it makes sence to fork the Ninja UI, please let me know.

Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel

Reply via email to