Hello,

Is it really impossible for Poller to have own named pipe ?

I'm doing research of how to migrate big distributed nagios/check_mk
system to Shinken distributed cluster.  Check_mk runs itself as single
active check per host, which in turn provide service states to nagios
command pipe as passive checks.

So it seems that i have to run Receiver near every Poller instance. It
could be a problem from point of consistency and fault tolerance -
i.e. if receiver dies, scheduler continues to assign check-mk tasks to
this poller :(

Quite easy to workaround it, although...

-- 
Mykola Grechukh

CTO, Satelliz-Ukraine

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel

Reply via email to