On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Hartmut Goebel <
h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just stepped over shinken.log and am wondering why there is a complete
> own implementation for logging. Why isn't the standard logging module used?
>
> [..]
>
> So if there is not reason for using a own implementation I'll change to
> a standard-implementation. I would do this in a separate branch for you
> to test and comment on it.
Hi,
The first log version was designed to be very simple, and didn't have to be
advanced (like filtering thing). But with the need of more things in this
part of code, it became more complex.
If we can simplify it why not, but without adding some magic things or
changing the behavior (some calls must still be able to directly write a
text, without presets or formating things) and of course manage the
"whatever"-> UTF8 thing (and we already saw a lot of "whatever" in the past
that make the log module crash :p ).
Jean
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
