or maybe "command_modulation" as we are changing the command of a check ?
2013/2/26 nap <napar...@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Florent Houbart <
> florent.houb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this info !
>> It's indeed rather simple, a good base to understand how to inject
>> configuration via modules.
>>
>> Florent
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>
> modules are a good way for importing moving configuration. I'm thinking
> about adding a way so the arbiter can easily "merge" data from various
> sources (from VMWare you got the VM property, from CMDB you got the OS and
> such things, from Active Directory you can have some tags, etc).
>
> Now if we came back to check_ways, François proposed in a github ticket to
> rename them check_modulation(s). It's maybe more clear about what they are
> doing, and it sounds like businessimpact_modulations or result_modulations
> after all.
>
> so what do you prefer? check_way(s) or check_modulation(s) ?
>
>
> Jean
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> Shinken-devel mailing list
> Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
