Hello All, On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:50:10PM +0100, nap wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sven Nierlein <s...@nierlein.de> wrote: > > > Hi Jean, > > > > I am missing an answer for the "What if such "lower" importance checks can > > be hidden by default on the "services" view?" > > > > - i am using this in thruk already[1]
just to get informed (had very little time) - is there any plan for a more pythonic interface to the configuration in the meantime ? Just dreaming about changing the configuration on the fly due to manipulating unimportant services away or changing notifications or adding/removing hosts etc... If there are already such mechanism in place, I would be thankfull for any hints and sorry if I missed something more or less obvious. Many thanks for your work, greetings Hermann P.S: Just noted that in git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-shinken/shinken.git since February version 2.2 is available (Thanks, Thibault) and even 2.4-BETA1 is checked in - if those would appear on packages.debian.org, I think the testing and spreading of shinken will increase. Will start to test that stuff now. -- Netzwerkadministration/Zentrale Dienste, Interdiziplinaeres Zentrum fuer wissenschaftliches Rechnen der Universitaet Heidelberg IWR; INF 368; 69120 Heidelberg; Tel: (06221)54-8236 Fax: -5224 Email: hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
