+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We've made the move from Log4J at work to Logback with very positive >> results. They work very similarly, but Logback is just more >> 'polished'. >> >> Any objections in getting rid of Log4J in favor of Logback as a >> test/samples dependency? Shiro does not have a logging implementation >> dependency (just SLF4J's API), so this doesn't affect end users - just >> how the developers use logging in test cases. Logback also implements >> the SLF4J API directly, so that means one less dependency in our pom - >> no SLF4J binding implementation .jar necessary. >> >> Thoughts? > > +1 > > -- > David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 > http://www.davidkarlsen.com > http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com >
