Sounds good to me.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > > On May 13, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > >> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Another quick comment. If you're using Nexus staging we don't need to >>> increment 1.0.x. You can just drop the staging repository and form a >>> new, >>> fixed, one. >> >> Well, that's a possibility in marginal cases depending on what went >> wrong but the tag's created already at that point. > > Good point. How about cutting a branch, say branches/1.0 and the release > manager, RM, has total control over it, i.e. nothing gets added there w/out > his explicit permission. The RM can cut a tag, create a staging repo, then > start a vote. If the vote fails he deletes both the tag and staging repo. > IIUC, deleting the tag is kosher so long has it has not been blessed by the > PMC by a release vote. (Craig, do you concur?) > > > Regards, > Alan > > >
