On May 13, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Ok, will do. You're always welcome to jump in when you find the
time :)
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
> wrote:
Yes. Mentors are not normally committers.
Right. It depends on the project, but mentoring doesn't require
committing code.
I originally thought I was going to be able to work on this project
but I
now realize that I have no time. :(
Regards,
Alan
On May 13, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I noticed on that page that you and Craig are listed as mentors and
not committers - does that mean I should remove you two from the
committers list in the STATUS file?
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
>
wrote:
I'm always confused. I wonder if this is our status file:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/shiro.html
Craig?
Yes, that's the status file. It would be good to update the file to
reflect the name change on the email aliases.
And if you can browse the email history and fill in the dates for the
to-do items that will help the incubator PMC evaluate the graduation
readiness of the project.
Craig
Regards,
Alan
On May 13, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I just committed an update to the file that lists committers and
their
ASF unix id/email.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org
>
wrote:
Ah - didn't know it needed to be filled in with anything. I
thought
it was like a section directing the project committers to do
fill out
the rest of the sections ;)
Are names sufficient? Or do we need to list an email address
or unix
username too?
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
<l...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
Project committers:
Seems empty.
On May 13, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I can update it - my understanding is that all of the items
have been
finished and warrant an 'X' next to them except for the
following 3:
-- Does the documentation site has enough information on the
architecure, design decisions and modules?
I will update the documentation to cover some more things
tomorrow.
Exit Milestone:
organisational acceptance:
-- Has the board accepted moving to a existing/new PMC?
Incubator sign-off:
-- Has the Incubator decided that the project has
accomplished all
of the above tasks?
Naturally I can't answer these two. But could the mentors
take a
look
at the file (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/STATUS
)
and concur that they agree that all others are completed? I
can
commit the file after there is consensus.
Les
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
<l...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
They're pretty religious about that STATUS file in our
root. Can
you
guys
take the time to update this?
Regards,
Alan
On May 13, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Awesome - thanks Alan. I think after we get our 1.0
release out,
we'll be in good shape to try to graduate.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
<l...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
The message below was completely stolen from Matt Hogstrom
but is
relevant
for us we well. Note that I removed a bit, "Releases are
happening".
I recently saw a note on podling graduation requirements
and it
occurred
to
me that there has never been a lot of discussion about
what that
means.
I'm
including a link to the graduation requirements page so
folks will
have
a
sense of what the Incubator PMC is looking for in terms of
graduating a
podling.
Overall the community has been doing well. The user
community is
using
the
code and asking questions / filing JIRAs, etc.
Take a look at this link to get a sense of some of the
other areas
that
people will look at to determine if a podling is ready to
graduate.
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
