I think it was a mistake to generate it and include it in the release
vote. People will focus on this non-release artifact.
Regards,
Alan
On May 26, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Additionally, the static sites will be versioned and archived unlike
the wiki, where there's in principle just one version of it.
Kalle
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Les Hazlewood
<lhazlew...@apache.org> wrote:
Yeah, its mainly just for the auto-generated reports - much easier to
let Maven generate and upload the site automagically than us having
to
piecemeal it and do each one individually.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Kalle Korhonen
<kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
> wrote:
Why do we generate a static maven site if we have a perfectly
good one driven by the wiki?
For javadocs, info & quality reports and since it's simple.
Kalle
