+1 from me for full built downloads (as I write this from a transatlantic
flight).

--Erik


On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.
>
> As a side note though, one of the things that is nice about a binary,
> non-source package is that I can download everything local to disk
> without needing to be connected to the internet to view documentation
> and reference .jars as a I need them.
>
> I think it would be nice to create such a package for our next
> release.  This is the reason for example, why Spring has a
> spring-3.0.2-with-dependencies.zip and a spring-3.0.2-with-docs.zip.
> When I wasn't a Maven or Ant+Ivy user, I really liked being able to
> have this 'one stop shop' download.
>
> How do other projects do this?  I'm sure most of them don't have a
> 'use Maven or you'll have to everything on the internet' approach,
> right?
>
> Les
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 3, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> My suggestion last night that I couldn't formulate very well was
> >>> basically this:
> >>> 1.  Unzip the 'official' source release.
> >>> 2.  Build the project in its entirety from the .zip
> >>> 3.  tarball up the built project (with target directories, etc) and
> >>> upload it to dist
> >>> 4.  Untar it on dist
> >>> 5.  Change the links on the dowload page to reference the dist target
> >>> locations.
> >>> Its not as clean as only uploading the raw .jars and .asc/.sha1/.md5
> >>> files, but it is easily automated.  If there is another mechanism that
> >>> easily allows us to automate upload of only what would be downloaded,
> >>> that'd be better.  I'm in favor of whatever is easiest.
> >>
> >> Lots of unzipping, tarring and untarring there. I was merely going to
> >> put the zip and the keys and possibly the shiro-all there and be done
> >> with it.
> >
> > I'm thinking that since this is what was voted on and checked, this is
> what
> > we should run with.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to