On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > This thread indicates to me that the project is pretty far along toward > graduation. Congratulations.
Thanks Craig! > There's only one &huh? in the report. What is meant by graduation "during > the next period"? Better to put a date here, like "by October" if that's > what you meant, or "by August". Meant to imply "during the next reporting period", but yeah it's vague. Changed to "by October" (just to give ourselves some time - but should really target August so we might actually graduate by September). Kalle > On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> I think we can also consider these remaining 3 complete as well, no? >> >> Yes, meant to ask about those when I did the release. The IP clearance >> was done around the time I came on board but the items were not >> checked out, I was unsure at the time if there was still some >> verification that needed to be done but I think it was just a lapse of >> nobody marking them as done. The dependencies and the distribution is >> all clear so they should all be complete AFAIK. >> >> Kalle >> >> >>> -- Do All the software in the codebase, are licensed (or >>> multi-licensed) under the Apache licence? >>> -- For all code included with the distribution that is not under the >>> Apache license, do we have the right to combine with Apache-licensed >>> code and redistribute? >>> -- Is all source code distributed by the project covered by one or >>> more of the following approved licenses: Apache, BSD, Artistic, >>> MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same terms? >>> >>> We couldn't have done a release without all 3 passing. >>> >>> Les >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Awesome, thanks Kalle! >>>> As to the comment about the committers, should we flag this in a board >>>> report yet? My opinion is that this might stir up things unnecessarily - >>>> we >>>> might resolve it internally before we attempt to graduate, and the IPMC >>>> wouldn't have needed to been bothered with it. Or if we should keep it in >>>> the report, maybe state that we're actively addressing it. >>>> As for the documentation - I think we're doing well enough in that area >>>> for the STATUS document. Sure, it can be improved (it can always be >>>> improved), but I've heard from others that it is already better than even >>>> some graduated sites' documentation. I'm not saying that there isn't a lot >>>> hat we can still do, but as far as the STATUS is concerned, I think we're >>>> good. >>>> My .02 >>>> Les >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Kalle Korhonen >>>> <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> See the proposed board report at >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/board/2010-07.txt and >>>>> comment/edit as you like. I'll add it to the board Wiki tomorrow COB. >>>>> >>>>> On STATUS, I say we can check this off: >>>>> -- Does the documentation site has enough information on the >>>>> architecure, design decisions and >>>>> modules? >>>>> >>>>> Kalle >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Les Hazlewood <l...@hazlewood.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry - sent accidentally. Any blocking items should still be >>>>>> documented in >>>>>> the status file in SVN - I don't have access to it at the moment... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Les Hazlewood <l...@hazlewood.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Kalle, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I haven't started it yet, and will be preoccupied today and tomorrow. >>>>>>> Would you mind giving a crack at it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only blocking items that I can think of are >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Kalle Korhonen < >>>>>>> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Les & others... just checking in case you've already started writing >>>>>>>> up the board report that's due on 14th. I'll be happy to do it if >>>>>>>> nobody's done it. The obvious highlight is 1.0.0 release, let me >>>>>>>> know >>>>>>>> if there are other big items that should be mentioned. I suppose we >>>>>>>> should also mention that project plans to release 1.0.1/1.1.0 and >>>>>>>> graduate in the next period, right? Any blocking items on the >>>>>>>> graduation checklist Les? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kalle >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >
