Hi Tamásm, I thank you for ur reply, but i dint understand the mushrooms concept. I am intrested in knowing why do we have to chose shiro over acegi framework.
Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > In short: the guy(s) who wrote spring acegi (originally Acegi Security) > consumed a lot of mushrooms of some sort ;) > Those mushrooms are okay to have fun with, but not while coding :D > > In contrary to Acegi, Shiro guys only suffer from identity problems > (JSecurity, Ki, Shiro, ProjectX). They do know when to put down the pencil > (and have some fun with mushrooms, or beer, or wherever their poison is). > > Shiro is much cleaner, easier to understand and lighter. +1 for it. > > ~t~ > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, akellakarthik > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> can any body give me the comparision of shiro with springs acegi >> framework. >> i have to make a decision. :) >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n2.nabble.com/Comparision-of-shiro-with-springs-acegi-framework-tp4260096p4260096.html >> Sent from the Shiro User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Comparision-of-shiro-with-springs-acegi-framework-tp4260096p4260330.html Sent from the Shiro User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
