Oh, I've got subprime arrangements on arguments! Assuming I am interpreting this snippet correctly, I would argue that forcing people to keep gutters is a "toolset quirk" whose only purpose will be to inconvenience the handful who want precisely this much client area. Why not have a "client-area-size" hash-argument that lets folks set the inner-window size they want, scrollbars accounted for? Admittedly, most people might not notice anyways. It's the same behaviour browsers exhibit.
Phill On 28/01/2008, why the lucky stiff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:26:21PM -0800, MenTaLguY wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:00:32 -0600, why the lucky stiff < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Shoes always uses the full client area width regardless of whether > > > a scrollbar is shown or not. > > > > Doesn't that mean the scrollbar will cover things up sometimes? > > Yes, totally. It's up to you to add a gutter. I really like this > rule a lot, but I'm dying to argue about it. Is it very wrong? > > _why >
