On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Luke Bayes wrote:
Is this idea even worth considering? :)
I support considering event bubbling.
This feature makes it much easier to build general purpose
interactive components. Concrete implementations can simply
subscribe to events at the scope where they have access - without
needing to reach deep into the implementation's composite structure.
On the other hand, when people don't expect or understand event
bubbling, it can be confusing and frustrating. These problems are
compounded when events are bubbled inconsistently.
This misunderstanding could be avoided, in part, by defaulting all
events to, say sinking, and allowing events to bubble as an option
left to user
