Yay! thanks guys, a Textmate bundle will scratch my itches as well! :)
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Tieg Zaharia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice! It sounds like it's almost even complete (we just have to keep up > with _why!). I like the idea of multiple templates, like a gem template or > abstraction template (using the $app = self trick)-- I'll pull your repo > later and if I can I'll try to help out. As far as the parentheses go, I > like non-parentheses too but there might have been some situations when the > non-parentheses added some ambiguity. It's probably fine though, so I > definitely support non-parentheses, > -tieg > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Joshua Ballanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Ah! I knew there was something else... >> Tieg, I noticed that you've used parentheses in all your snippets. While >> this is not wrong, I feel like the trend with Ruby is to not use them unless >> they are needed. So, for example, it would be: >> >> oval 20, 30, 40, 50 >> >> instead of: >> >> oval(20, 30, 40, 50) >> >> Of course, there are times when you do need the parentheses. So, I guess >> the question is: "what should the snippets do?" Would it be better to leave >> out the parentheses, so that using the snippets results in more Ruby-ish >> code? Or would it be better to leave the parentheses so that beginners using >> the snippets don't get into trouble? >> >> - Josh >> >> >> On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Tieg Zaharia wrote: >> >> Hey Josh, >> I setup a little bundle too but haven't had much time to work on it. It >> looks like you've got the Syntax, and I've got the Snippets-- maybe our git >> projects could mingle? >> >> http://github.com/tiegz/shoes-textmate-bundle/tree/master >> >> -tieg >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Joshua Ballanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey list! >>> >>> Well, it's not much, but I've started a TextMate bundle for Shoes. You >>> can find it at: http://github.com/jballanc/shoes.tmbundle/tree/master. >>> Right now, it doesn't do much (and no, I'm not being modest...it really >>> doesn't do much). I've added the various special Shoes words to the language >>> grammar, and there's a "Run in Shoes" command linked to command-R. Next step >>> is to add some useful snippets. Hence, why I'm sending this to the list. >>> Ideas? What snippets would be most useful? I'm thinking basic snippets for >>> "stack" and "flow", but what properties should show up by default? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Josh >>> >> >> >> >
