Wow...I had no idea after() existed. Is that an undocumented feature? Anyways, it's a solution to what I want to do, even if it's somewhat more cumbersome. It probably will be really, really useful in the future, though.
Thanks for the tip! On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Bluebie, Jenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > @our_background = background... > > and later that day... > > after(@our_background) do > new_one = background... > @our_background.remove > @our_background = new_one > end > > I could have sworn there was a 'replace' method you could use on all > elements to replace the element with some other one, but now I can't find it > in the docs. _why, consider that a feature request. >
