I think he means the SHY functionality will remain, but become a part
of the packager, making it in to one step to package multiple things
in to an .EXE or whatever. Do we really need the .shy file format? Or
should we just have the packaged stuff as the final output?
On 20/09/2008, at 1:42 PM, Joshua Choi wrote:
Oh, I see. Thanks for the quick reply.
Hmm, packaging packages a file into an .app file for Mac OS X and an
.exe file for Windows. However, dependencies, i.e. files in the same
folder as the script, do not seem to be packaged in with the script.
This is problematic for apps split across many files, as well as apps
that use images stored in the script's folder.
Are there plans in the future for packaging multiple files into a
package?
Sincerely,
Joshua Choi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:34 PM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:25:33PM -0700, Joshua Choi wrote:
Has Mr. Why temporarily removed Shy functionality? Can we
expect it to return (along with more documentation :) ) in the
future?
Yeah, the --shy maker is going away. Everything's going to go thru
the -p packager.
_why
