On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Seth Thomas Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Jeff Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Seth Thomas Rasmussen wrote: >>> >>> Back on point, I dunno if throwing a patch like this in right away >>> would be best if some other namespace related changes weren't made. I >>> kind of want _why to weigh in on my question from the other thread >>> about how necessary and flexible the auto-namespacing behavior we have >>> now is. >>> >>> I think Bluebie mentioned how the current behavior is similar to how >>> Camping does things. I remember bumping into that and struggling for a >>> little bit, and ultimately I don't think it's necessarily horrible if >>> you have to be aware of this wrinkle in the Ruby environment Shoes >>> creates. But it certainly would be better if we could at least help >>> avoid people being caught up on it like we were. >>> >> >> Hmm.. I don't know what other namespace issues you're referring to that this >> patch would affect. Could you explain further? > > Well, the Widget.inherited patch only allows for > > class Neato < Shoes::Widget > > to work, right? I raised the point that it might be nice if we had > something like Rails that uses Module#const_missing and such
"it might be nice if we had something like Rails HAS ..." to be clear -- Seth Thomas Rasmussen http://greatseth.com
