Oh. Loafer is very good. Sneaker does imply that hackerish energy, a wee bit of which is employed in subversive ways. Like hiding behind made up names, nonsense phrases, and deceptively naive-looking cartoons.
i can imagine a whole complex ecology of shoebies and shoesers, sneakers and healers, tappers and toesers and flips and flops. (i've spend a fair bit of time working on flops....) Clogs, as well. I've been a clog many a times. And loafers. We will always have loafers among us, thank god dan On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Joshua Ballanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:30 AM, peter retief wrote: > > I actually quite like the "manual in shoes" for shoes >> > > Me too...I also like embedded IRC client idea. Here's a though: prefix all > the IRC messages with what page the user is on. That way, if they're asking > a question on page 1, one of us could say "Hey, looks like you're on page > 1...turn to page 10 and you'll have your answer!" > > It would be "very" nice to have a container window with a space to run >> bits of code (irb) and child window (shoes apps) >> >> It doesn't have to be like anything we have seen before - does it? >> > > This is sort of the H-ety H idea. The biggest stumbling block I see for > this is the one global scope that Shoes introduces. I may not have been > paying attention, though...any word on sandboxes and such? > > But the shoes is great and thanks - erm and a name for shoers - could >> be healers, steppers, toe-rs, tappers, studs, tipplers and etc etc. . >> > > I would like to be known as a Loafer... > > -Josh >
