Have you checked it? ;)
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2009-01-29, o godz. 06:13, przez Seth Thomas
Rasmussen:
This isn't a Shoes bug. It's normal Ruby behavior. Think about what
you said about Outer2. In the first example, Inner is defined at the
top level, so referencing it anywhere is no problem. In the second, it
is within Outer, but you reference it within Outer::Foo. Notice where
Ruby thinks Inner should be in the error message from the second
example.
Replace the "Shoes.app do ... end" block with simple "puts
Outer::Foo.getBoo.inspect". It will work without problems under
standard ruby interpreter (1.8.7p72 in my case).
If the second example's getBoo were to reference Outer::Inner, that
would work.
Nope. It wouldn't. Just check it. The only difference will be in the
"uninitialized constant" name...
regards
sw
