Mm, uh oh.
What do you get when you do a `which ruby`? I have the funny feeling
that macports is trying to build shoes against the default osx version
of ruby and not the macports version.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Alcides Fonseca wrote:
On 2009/02/02, at 23:07, Christian Bryan wrote:
Hey Shoesers!
I just put some finishing touches on a PortFile for MacPorts
that'll make it easier for people to build the latest version of
Shoes. I think it's okay, but I'd like some help testing it. I'd
really like to hear how it works on machines other than my own.
To test it you'll need to grab the latest PortFile from GitHub http://github.com/waltz/shoes-macports
and you'll need to create a local port repository. http://guide.macports.org/#development.local-repositories
Once you've got that setup you can install with a quick 'sudo port
install shoes' or 'sudo port install shoes +latest' for the latest
Shoes source.
The script currently installs shoes to /Applications/Shoes.app so
it might give some complaint if you already have a version there.
(What do you guys think of this behavior?)
Thanks for any input!
First it failed because of a previous glib2. After deactivating the
old one, here's the error it gave me:
http://pastie.org/377883
I had neither ruby nor rubygems via macports.
Alcides Fonseca
