On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, e deleflie wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Hugh Sasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK, I'd suggest that you explain what is broken about the headers,

:-) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> > and we ask _why if he can roll out a fix on the raisin series for the
> > time being.  We know he's frantically busy on all sorts of stuff, but
> > a new patched version of raisins would be nice.  The Shoes news page
> > has been rather quiet over recent weeks, so it would let people know
> > things are still going on behind the scenes.
> 
> That would be great... if the download header (OSX only) issue could

You do need to say what it is now, and what it should be so that a patch
can be inferred. :-)  I don't know my way around the code, and don't have
time at the moment to fix that, but if you can be specific, _Why may say
"Oh, they're only asking for *this*...".  Or tell us that this is nontrivial
and we'll have to wait.

> be patched for raisins. The only way around this issue (for me) is to
> use download on windows, and net::http on OSX... which is pretty
> messy.

:-( 
> 
> I actually have an other requirement, which I'm not sure that download
> satisfies.
> 
> _why, if you are reading can you comment?
> 
> basically, I am uploading very large files (from 100MB to 1GB) to
> Amazon S3. This causes 2 other requirements ... the first is that the
> upload has to be streamed ... the second is that I need to show an
> upload progress bar. The progress bar should be easy if the content is
> streamed ... but can download stream a file (in a post)?

I don't know about this at all.  There was some stuff about streaming
on Redhanded, but I think it was downloads, so....  Does S3 assume a
perfect, fast internet, or does it have another part of the API which
would allow you to split the file into chunks, so that when your dialup
connection falls over, or a passing train scatters your wireless connection
to smithereens, or,... you can still send the whole file eventually?

> 
> (I guess I should try it before asking the question)
> 
> Etienne
> 
        Hugh

Reply via email to