Would the UI code not get really messy?
I have very little experience with complex UIs, so don't know, but remember
an OpenLaszlo book recommending that you extract any state changes your UI
undergoes into some kind of state controller that got called with things
like "state_controller.transition( 'to-display-product', ... )". I'm
paraphrasing incredibly heavily there, not least because the examples in the
book were in LZX, not Ruby.
But then, that state controller could get called by the business/modularised
controllers when they added or indexed or deleted or whatever.
Or am I muddying the waters horribly, here?
Wouldn't be the first time. ;)
   Doug.

2009/4/20 Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>

> Hi Doug,
>
> That sounds great, except for the part where you would have to
> separate drawing (view) from the event handling (controller).
>
> For example
> button("my button").click do
>     somemodel.dosomething
>     widget1.draw
>     somemodelother.dosomething
> end
>
> I guess you could start off with 2 layers, a "model" and a
> "controller/view".
>
> Joel
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, do you think you could have, say:
> > 1) A models folder, with business objects in it.
> > 2) A widgets folder, with the actual widgets.
> > 3) A controllers folder, with modules named for sensibly modularised
> parts
> > of the app, that event handlers call methods on.
> >
> > Would that make sense?
> > Cheers,
> >    Doug.
> >
> > 2009/4/19 Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> MVC would actually play very well:
> >>
> >> Model - the logical entities of your app, as Widgets or Objects.
> >> View - drawing elements, widgets, layout
> >> Controller - your event handlers (click, hover etc..)
> >>
> >> Joel
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:38 PM, doug livesey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi -- I'm mainly a Rails coder, so am used to having a full-featured
> MVC
> >> > framework do a lot of my thinking for me when it comes to application
> >> > structure & organisation.
> >> > I've been thinking of ways that I can adapt the rails way of
> organising
> >> > things to Shoes, but of course they are different paradigms, so was
> >> > wondering if there were any, more desktop-app-driven
> >> > approaches/frameworks
> >> > that people used with shoes?
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >    Doug.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> joel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> joel
>

Reply via email to