On Fri, 29 May 2009, Devyn Cairns wrote: > Your welcome! > > Wow... UNIX has superior awesomeness. Apple has already jumped > onboard. Microsoft just needs to make a UNIX-based operating system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix Used this on an Intel 86/310 system driving a cellular logic image processor (CLIP4). > now instead of trying to be different and screwing things up. > > Anyway, I'm glad I could help. But the packager should work on Windows, so... It would be worth exploring the Windows options for that reason exactly. Hugh > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Roger Ostrander <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interestingly enough, 'Switch to Linux' was the solution. As far as > > packaging, goes, that is. Running the shoes packager in a VMed Ubuntu > > resulted in a nice pristine .exe which works fine under XP SP2. > > Thanks for the advice, all :) > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Devyn Cairns <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Honestly, I would just say "Switch to Linux" but I know that sometimes > >> that isn't an option. > >> > >> It doesn't really seem like a Shoes hiccup though... what happens if > >> you package it on Windows XP SP2? > >> > >> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Roger Ostrander <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I created my program on Windows XP, SP3. I used the packager to > >>> make it into a .exe and didn't have any problems during the process. > >>> However, when I transfer that .exe over to my Virtual Machine and try > >>> to run it, I get: > >>> > >>> Error in C:/Program Files/Common Files/Shoes/0.r1134/lib/shoes/shy.rb > >>> line 62 > >>> ! invalid distance too far back > >>> > >>> So I tried testing it on my computer, only to discover that the .exe > >>> doesn't even work there! > >>> > >>> Error in C:/Program Files/Common > >>> Files/Shoes/0.r1134/lib/shoes/minitar.rb line 661 > >>> ! Permission denied - C:/DOCUME~1/Roger/LOCALS~1/Temp/shoes-llm.4208/./ > >>> > >>> Any help for either of these? I really like using Shoes as a > >>> development platform, please don't make me go back to Java :) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Roger > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ~devyn > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Roger > > > > > > -- > ~devyn >
