TFlan-- I've also wondered about the logical pairing of those horse/ass numbers. But thanks to symbolic semantics, you may be right.
Just thought maybe God errored on one of his evolutionary weekdays. (Or do I mean "erred"?) Few are good at math. God's numeracy is questionable--as you'll find if you will read "Genesis" carefully. Before, there was no need to grade your mail. Now. . . . tflan wrote: > Consider then the adage: "There Are More Horse's Asses Than There Are > Horses." > > TFlan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "connie mack rea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:03 AM > Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Mime-Version: 1.0 > > > Language will bite you on the ass when you lose control. Or try to be > > smarter than you are. > > > > Perhaps you mean "ad nauseam"? > > > > Much depends on whose anus is being bitten. > > > > It is better to be the horse fly biting than the horse bitten. > > > > > > > > Al Taylor wrote: > > > > > Anal retentiveness ad nasuem. > > > >
