RE: ShopTalk: Forged iron comparison

[Jonathan LaChance]

I really am starting to like them. I've been playing them for about 7 weeks now and I really like the way they set up.  They are a very traditional look with very minimum offset.  The only thing that the Q4 does have that is "non traditional" is the length of the blade seems alot longer than most clubs.  The clubs are very solid and have kicked a set of PHD Tour's out of the bag. The ball flight is very high in the short irons but that may have more to do with the rifle shafts (I was playing the TT Tri-Golds in the PHD tours) I would say the Q4's give more "feedback" on mis hits than many cavity backs.   In short....They are definately a very solid club.   JP LaChance Madison, WI -----Original Message----- From: Tom Janson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Forged iron comparison Jonathan,   How do you like the Q4's?   Tom Janson ----- Original Message ----- From: Jonathan LaChance To: 'Shoptalk (E-mail) Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:19 AM Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Forged iron comparison I ordered a demo of the Blade version of the near net I just built the club on Monday night.  I hope to get the Neat Net Blade version out ot the range this weekend or early next week.  The finish on the blade was very good.  Tradisional shape and size (looks small next to my Q4's).  I will keep you posted.   JP LaChance ccugolf.com -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ShopTalk: Forged iron comparison Could I get some opinions on the Raven Forged cavity back (not the Near Net) and the Kent Alpha forged cavity back. Fit & Finish?  Overall Quality?  Playability?   Jeff Whole-in-One ____________________________________________________   IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here