It sounds like you have real data. I'm curious about the quality that you get both with WAAS and without. The vendor data that I see mostly says that 75% of the WAAS points will be within 3-5 feet, but most of the "real world" info that I have run across says that 7 meters is more common.
Scott Bershing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Many of the courses (at least in Michigan) use differential GPS, and are >able to get accuracy down to within a couple meters. I assume the courses >down there are set up similarly. �Also, down there you guys are able to >take advantage of the WAAS satellite, so even with some of the handheld >units that are WAAS enabled you should be able to get within 10 feet. �Even >way up here in the U.P. of Michigan, I'm able to regularly get within 10-15 >feet when I'm lucky enough to pick up the WAAS signal. > >As far as cold and snow, you guys down south crack me up. �We are supposed >to get up to 2� F today, with wind chills around -30 to -40� F. � At least >when it's that cold, we don't get as much snow - only supposed to get 3-6" >today. �I've got about 4' in my back yard, and for the season we are at >about 180". > >At 08:38 AM 2/10/2003 -0500, you wrote: >>With the kind of GPS devices in the carts, you will get results anywhere >>within 50 feet or so of the real location. �How many clubs would that be? >> >> >Seems the GPS works about 50% of the time. �I don't trust it, anyway, and >> >usually pace off the distances from the stakes. > > >
