Greg, 
Your a little backward in your analysis....
What you would want is the shaft to be loaded in a plane where any effects of the 
shaft itself (bend, spine, construction) do NOT cause the shaft to deviate from the 
plane it's loaded in.  Alan's demonstration shows that the shaft will unload in the 
identical direction it's loaded in, irregardless of any effects of the shaft itself.
  
Basically, if you load the shaft into the spine plane, as it slowly reaches maximum 
load is where it's perceived that the spine could make the shaft twist or move off of 
the plane it's being loaded in (as when you put it in the spine finder and slowly 
twirl, feeling the shaft 'jump' into a neutral position).  Now assuming the spine can 
do this, the shaft is now bent outside of the plane that it was loaded in.  Alan has 
shown that it will return 180 from where it now is, which would be outside of the load 
plane (or swing plane).  Again the recoil or unload is NOT effected by the spine until 
the shaft goes past neutral and re-loads in the opposite direction - long after 
impact. 

So, if the neutral plane is aligned at 3-9 (therefore spine plane is 6-12 - mainly 
discussing graphite, steel where a spinefinder measures the degree that the shaft is 
bent nedds to be address separately since the plane concept is really not applicable), 
you would effectively load the shaft into the spine plane as in the normal golf swing 
the shaft is loaded with the leading edge parallel to the plane.  So, the logic 
presented (with the big assumption in saying that the spine does change the bending 
properties of a shaft enough to actually have an effect) indicates that the spine 
plane should be in the 3-9 alignment.  

If you think about it with regard to loading instead of unloading, this might make 
sense.....

Pat K 
> 
> From: "Bernie Baymiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/03/04 Tue PM 05:05:33 EST
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RE: ShopTalk: Harrison Spineless Technology; Another take
> 
> Greg,
> 
> > On placement my intuition tells me that if the clubhead is releasing from
> > being loaded coming into impact I would want that clubhead to exhibit the
> > same self centering effect that a shaft exhibits when tension is placed on
> > it in a spinefinder.  I guess that's spine at 9. Or is it??  ;-)
> 
> Nope. That's NBP (or N1) at 9.
> 
> Bernie
> Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to