This is indeed a fascinating post. Apparently the "Flexmaster" is the
solution to all fitting problems. Just measure the deflection in pounds,
find the spine by frequency (!), remeasure (?), cut the tips only, cut to
length, add the grips and voila! A perfect fit. But . . . allow me a
question or two;

How do you know what number of pounds is correct for the golfer? The same
question can be asked of frequency-ers for that matter. There must be some
number that's targeted. I note on your website that frequency is still a
factor in your fitting method. Are you saying that even though frequency
determinations of shaft flex are "out of whack" that you still use them?
Does that mean that frequency matters somehow? Or are you saying that
frequency in an of itself is not the sole determination of shaft selection?
If so, what I get from your argument is that the Flexmaster is the best way
to select shafts, but only in conjunction with a spinefinding device . . . a
freq meter. Isn't that a contradiction?

I note that you claim well over a decade of experience in custom
clubfitting, and that you're a "Class A" clubmaker. Is that PCS? GCA? I'm
not questioning expertise, I'm just interested in qualifications.

I, like many others here, have been at this mystery of clubfitting for a lot
of years. I don't know of any single machine, measuring device, testing
device, or any other mechanical apparatus that will correctly and accurately
provide the right equipment for any golfer . . .  not one! Certainly your
device does an admiral job of measuring shaft characteristics but really
Ian, that's all it does. If I were still in business and I owned a
Flexmaster I too would add Flexmaster's advertising copy to my website as
well. Or, if I owned the "Pureing" system, or Colin Dick's SpineFinder, or
Neubecker's device, I'd sure as hell tout them.

But . . . but; to repeat; there does not exist in the world of custom
clubfitting any device that will accurately and consistently predict the
right combo of head, shaft and grip for any golfer on earth. To suggest
otherwise is either naive or misleading.

TFlan

Reply via email to