Maybe . . . maybe not. Reaming out the very small diameter at the bottom of the hosel is hardly a sea change. Reaming out a taper tip hosel to parallel is. I always - 100% of the time, told my customers what could, should, and should not be done as regards modifying a clubhead. I ain't arguing, just offering a suggestion. That's what we're all about here, isn't it?
TFlan ----- Original Message ----- From: "jb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:19 AM Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Callaway x-14 reshaft > Isn't better to leave a clubhead as it was designed, even if it is a bit > more time-consuming to duplicate (in this case) the OEM's shaft installation > technique? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of tflan > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Callaway x-14 reshaft > > > Parallel but there's a smaller diameter at the bottom of the hosel. Note > that Callaway slits their iron tips and shoves a tip plug in them. The > slit/plug allows the shaft to be firmly set - and no doubt there's a > cosmetic effect as well. Your choices are to ream out the hosel to .370" or > slit the tips. Reaming is easier. > > TFlan > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 6:19 PM > Subject: ShopTalk: Callaway x-14 reshaft > > > > Do the callway X-14 Pro irons take a parallel or taper tip shaft? > > > > TIA > > John B > > > > >
