--- Bernie Baymiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Alan,
>
>Off the shaft subject and on the Nike subject, just
>noticed that a Nike driver made the USGA
>non-conforming list. Wonder if that was the head you
>demo'd? Bet the rep didn't mention it. (But then, I
>don't even know how many driver heads that Nike
>sells.)
>
>That USGA non-conforming list is growing so long it
>takes 5 minutes just to go from top to bottom.
>Wonder what the USGA will do when all the
>manufacturers completely ignore them and all drivers
>(except the pro custom versions) are non-conforming?
>:-) The longer and longer list is also getting very
>confusing to a lot of players. I was told the other
>day that my 10� Integra Super 450 was
>non-conforming...the guy had it confused with the
>Integra SoooLong 450, which is non-conforming. What
>a wriggly bundle of worms they've got everyone into
>with that COR limitation.
>
>Bernie
Greetings,
I just got a sampling of some of the new Nickent heads, they look decent, one of them they claim to be nonconforming and it has . 860 cor stamped on the head, now I never expected that it would actually be . 860 because I know how difficult it is to achieve but figured it was at least over . 830 anyway I looked at the usga site and was amazed how many more heads were on there since the last time I checked it, thank goodness they at least have it in alphabetical order, well guess what the Nickent head wasn't even on it.
David
