CB Well.....
It looks like 360 is the way to go. I tried a 360 and 420 club at the local range. Visually size difference didn't seem to matter.They both looked OK to me. I did move the ball up and also higher then I usually tee it. Hit some nice straight ones but also faded both once in a while (Most likely a swing burp). But I didn't take my driver to compare distance. I've never trusted the distance signs. Have no idea whether they went farther or not. Guess I'll take my driver and buy a bucket to see what happens. As for the Firehawk, I gave it strong consideration untill I noted that it needed a larger shaft tip. As I might try different shafts, I really don't want to get into shims, special ferrules etc. Sorta disapointed because one of the shafts I want to try is a Mars Chronicle Filament wound. It is deep red as well and would have been a nice color match. Thanks for the insight. Bob Sielski On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:03:07 -0700, Corey Bailey wrote: >Typically, the larger the clubhead, the more difficult it is to get >it square at impact. You will probably have to move the ball forward >some in your stance with the 420cc head. > >I have both the 360 and 420 as demos built with ZT shafts and Wishon >grips and indeed, I tend to slice the 420 more often with the same >setup at address. > >A number of prospective customers have not only experienced the same > phenomenon but felt it was just too big. Another possibility is the >400cc Firehawk from Wishon Golf. It's built so that it doesn't look >as big at address as it really is and hits extremely well compared >to other 400cc driver heads. > >Hope I didn't confuse the issue by bringing up another possibility. > >Best, > >CB > >
