Jim:

            That’s what makes the first step trimming the best because you don’t have to measure the hosel depths. Maltby lists the entire true temper line of shaft trimming based on first step dimensions

 

Don Johnson

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim & Ivette
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: tip trimming dynalite shafts.

 

thanks david, but does that trimming going to be the same for a 1" bottom of bore to ground as would a 1.6" BB to gnd?

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:14 PM

Subject: Re: ShopTalk: tip trimming dynalite shafts.

 

In a message dated 1/5/2004 4:07:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Hi Guys, I need some help with a set of shafts i got in today that dont
quite seem to fit the mold of what i am use to seeing. They are dynalite R/S
shafts. Weight - 123.5 gms, length 42" , Tip section 12.5". This seems to be
a non standard dyna lite shaft, The step pattern matches an old shaft i have
that i know to be a dynalite but the weight is a little high, the tip
section is 1/2" over and the overall length is 1" over. So i am a little
confused on what to do with the trimming for a wedge set i have. my second
problem is with general tip trimming guidlines that i am also a little
confused on. as i understand it the general rule for trimming iron shafts is
based on a 1" bottom of bore to sole. for example i have a wedge i am
shafting to an R flex, the top of hosel to bottom of bore is 1.4", the
bottom of bore to sole is 1.6" in order to achieve an R flex according to
mfg spec of the shaft I would need to trim an additional .6" from the
specified trimming guide. Is this correct? Thanks - Jim Letourneau



Hi Jim,
4 1/2 for R, 6 1/5 for S, somewhere in between for somewhere in between, and more for more and less for less.
David

Reply via email to